SHOE, SHOE-LATCHET (see Sandal; Dress) (נַ֫עַל, H5837, that which is bound on, שְׂרֹֽוכְ־נַ֔עַל, sandal bound on with something twisted; ὑπόδημα, G5687, something bound under; σανδάλιον, G4908, sandal). Of the thirty plus occurrences of “shoe” and “shoe-latchet” in the KJV, about two-thirds are rendered by “sandal” and “sandal-thong” in the RSV, because “sandal” is more accurate to portray to the modern mind a picture of the ancient Near Eastern shoe. Minimally, it consisted of a flat sole made of leather, wood or matted grass, with a leather strap or thong (latchet) attached on each side to hold it on the foot. There were, of course, variations depending on the type of use. The shepherd required a strong and sturdy sandal as he walked upon the rugged ground. Women of rank, on the other hand, would wear a light weight and more ornamental type.
The symbolic significance of shoes is a wellattested scriptural phenomenon. At least five different fig. uses can be detected:
(1) The sandal-thong (or shoe-latchet) sometimes signified cheapness. This grew out of its being the least expensive of personal items. Hence, Abraham would not agree to take even the most insignificant possession of the king of Sodom (
(2) Growing out of the concept of cheapness is the idea that shoes depict the most humble part of a person. Accordingly,
(3) The wearing of shoes often spoke of travel or readiness to travel. Thus the Israelites were to eat the Passover with shoes on, i.e., in readiness to depart immediately (
(4) The defilement contracted by the shoes in traveling resulted in another symbol: the shoe frequently stands for spiritual contamination. For this reason Moses had to remove his shoes while on holy ground (
(5) A very prominent fig. use of the shoe was to symbolize a transfer of property right or responsibility. In the case of the Heb. who refused to fulfill his levirate responsibility toward his deceased brother’s wife, his refusal was marked by the removal of his shoe (
G. M. Machie, HDB, IV (1902), 508; E. A. Speiser, BASOR, LXXVII (1940), 15-20; J. M. Myers, IDB, IV (1962), 213, 214.