David Hume
- David Hume
Description
David Hume's rational arguments against miracles and responses to those arguments.
Outline
Miracles
Part 2
II. David Hume
A. Two Interpretations
1. The Metaphysical Interpretation
a. A miracle is a violation of a law of nature.
b. Nothing can violate the laws of nature.
c. Metaphysical interpretation would introduce a contradiction.
d. Hume's greatest discovery - analysis of a law of science.
e. No certitude that what has happened in the past will happen in the future.
f. You cannot then teach that miracles are impossible.
2. The Epistemological Interpretation
a. Nobody can prove that miracles are impossible.
b. No human could ever know that a miracle did occur.
c. Hume's argument deals in probabilities.
d. Miracle must be the least likely event possible.
B. Responses to Hume
1. A person may be an eyewitness to a miracle.
2. Some important natural laws would not have been discovered following Hume's skepticism.
C. Hume's Subsidiary Arguments
D. Answer to Hume's Subsidiary Argument
Transcript
No transcript data available for this lecture.Embed
Copy and paste the following HTML code into your web page or blog post to embed our Flash audio player for this lecture into your site.Reference materials
Help
Instructions for listening to this lecture:Along the left side of the window are all the files you can download for this lecture. This includes a link to download the lecture in high quality or in fast download, the outline, transcription, teacher notes, student notes, handouts, etc. If the link does not appear, then we do not have the material. If you want to listen to the lecture on the computer, you can click the right arrow on the Listen now player (the free Flash player is required) and check out the outline and transcription for the class (if they are available). You can also click on Reference Materials and search BibleGateway for helpful information. If we have the class in video, there will be a final tab.

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo